<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Experiment Teams Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saucerpass.com/2009/08/draft-experiment-teams-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saucerpass.com/2009/08/draft-experiment-teams-comparison/</link>
	<description>SaucerPass.com &#124; In-depth fantasy hockey coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jstainer</title>
		<link>http://saucerpass.com/2009/08/draft-experiment-teams-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jstainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saucerpass.com/?p=2531#comment-483</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if there is any way to run this sort of test without dipping into Yahoo Public Leagues.  The amount of crappy owners and randomness in most public leagues is really enough to cast some concern on this test.

I love the idea and the results are exactly what I would expect as well, but if there were some way to be sure that some of the randomness were removed it would be even better.

Perhaps the best setup would be four 8 team leagues that each included 2 of each type of drafting strategies.  There would be 4 leagues and each person would have to draft one of each type of team in each of the 4 leagues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if there is any way to run this sort of test without dipping into Yahoo Public Leagues.  The amount of crappy owners and randomness in most public leagues is really enough to cast some concern on this test.</p>
<p>I love the idea and the results are exactly what I would expect as well, but if there were some way to be sure that some of the randomness were removed it would be even better.</p>
<p>Perhaps the best setup would be four 8 team leagues that each included 2 of each type of drafting strategies.  There would be 4 leagues and each person would have to draft one of each type of team in each of the 4 leagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

